Quadro NVS 110M vs RADEON X600 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro NVS 110M vs RADEON X600 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro NVS 110M vs RADEON X600 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro NVS 110M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 132W, a 87W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

RADEON X600 SE

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌193.3% higher power demand at 132W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X600 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (49 vs 48), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X600 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON X600 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro NVS 110M vs RADEON X600 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro NVS 110M

The Quadro NVS 110M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 48 points. Launch price was $109.94.

RADEON X600 SE

The RADEON X600 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro NVS 110M scores 48 and the RADEON X600 SE reaches 49 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 110M is built on Kepler while the RADEON X600 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 1,792 (RADEON X600 SE). Raw compute: 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 8.942 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 SE).

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	RADEON X600 SE
G3D Mark Score	48	49+2%
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	1792+367%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5422 TFLOPS	8.942 TFLOPS+1549%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	32	112+250%
L1 Cache	32 KB	512 KB+1500%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	RADEON X600 SE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 110M and 64-bit on the RADEON X600 SE. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 2 MB (RADEON X600 SE) — the RADEON X600 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	RADEON X600 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 110M draws 45W versus the RADEON X600 SE's 132W — a 98.3% difference. The Quadro NVS 110M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 350W (RADEON X600 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	RADEON X600 SE
TDP	45W-66%	132W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Perf/Watt	1.1+175%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON X600 SE (2023 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	RADEON X600 SE
MSRP	—	$100
Codename	GK107	Navi 23
Release	July 23 2013	December 8 2023
Ranking	#856	#176

Search Quadro NVS 110M on Amazon

Search RADEON X600 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.