Quadro NVS 110M vs Radeon X1600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro NVS 110M vs Radeon X1600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro NVS 110M vs Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro NVS 110M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 255W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon X1600

2020

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Quadro NVS 110M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌466.7% higher power demand at 255W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon X1600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (49 vs 48), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon X1600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon X1600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro NVS 110M vs Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro NVS 110M

The Quadro NVS 110M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 48 points. Launch price was $109.94.

Radeon X1600

The Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2105 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro NVS 110M scores 48 and the Radeon X1600 reaches 49 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 110M is built on Kepler while the Radeon X1600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 4,608 (Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 19.4 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600).

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	Radeon X1600
G3D Mark Score	48	49+2%
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	4608+1100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5422 TFLOPS	19.4 TFLOPS+3478%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	32	288+800%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	Radeon X1600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 110M and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600.

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	Radeon X1600
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 110M draws 45W versus the Radeon X1600's 255W — a 140% difference. The Quadro NVS 110M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 350W (Radeon X1600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	Radeon X1600
TDP	45W-82%	255W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	1.1+450%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon X1600 (2020 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	Radeon X1600
MSRP	—	$199
Codename	GK107	Navi 21
Release	July 23 2013	October 28 2020
Ranking	#856	#34

Search Quadro NVS 110M on Amazon

Search Radeon X1600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.