
FirePro 2450

Quadro NVS 110M
FirePro 2450 vs Quadro NVS 110M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 2450 vs Quadro NVS 110M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 2450 vs Quadro NVS 110M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 2450
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
Quadro NVS 110M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2450 vs Quadro NVS 110M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2450
The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

Quadro NVS 110M
The Quadro NVS 110M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 48 points. Launch price was $109.94.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2450 scores 51 versus the Quadro NVS 110M's 48 — the FirePro 2450 leads by 6.3%. The FirePro 2450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro NVS 110M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (FirePro 2450) vs 384 (Quadro NVS 110M). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450) vs 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 110M).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51+6% | 48 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS+1% | 0.5422 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+200% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2450 and 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 110M.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2450 draws 150W versus the Quadro NVS 110M's 45W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro NVS 110M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2450) vs 350W (Quadro NVS 110M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 45W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 1.1+267% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













