Quadro FX 350M vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 350M vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 350M vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 350M

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 189W instead of 300W, a 111W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

2025

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌58.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 189W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 350M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 7.1% in PassMark G3D (45 vs 42), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 55nm, and 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 350M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 350M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 350M vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 350M

The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 350M scores 45 versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 42 — the Quadro FX 350M leads by 7.1%. The Quadro FX 350M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 350M) vs 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700).

Feature	Quadro FX 350M	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
G3D Mark Score	45+7%	42
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 4.0
Process Node	55 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	240	4096+1607%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	47.84 TFLOPS+7590%
ROPs	32	128+300%
TMUs	80	256+220%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 350M	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 350M has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 carries 512 MB. RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350M and 64-bit on the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 350M) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 350M	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro FX 350M	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
DirectX	9.0c	9.0
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	2.1+5%	2.0
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 350M) vs None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP1) vs VideoShader. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 350M) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700).

Feature	Quadro FX 350M	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP1)	VideoShader
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV9	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 350M draws 189W versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 300W — a 45.4% difference. The Quadro FX 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 350M) vs 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 175mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70.

Feature	Quadro FX 350M	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
TDP	189W-37%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	0mm	175mm
Height	0mm	100mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80	70-13%
Perf/Watt	0.2+100%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 (2025 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 350M	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GT200B	Navi 48
Release	November 11 2008	July 23 2025
Ranking	#815	#23

Search Quadro FX 350M on Amazon

Search RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.