Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon X1600

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 350M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1600

2020Boost: 2105 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon X1600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon X1600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 350M

2008

Why buy it

  • Draws 189W instead of 255W, a 66W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (45 vs 49).
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon X1600

2020

Why buy it

  • +8.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Quadro FX 350M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 34.9% higher power demand at 255W vs 189W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 8.9% in PassMark G3D (49 vs 45), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 350M

The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon X1600

The Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2105 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 350M scores 45 versus the Radeon X1600's 49 — the Radeon X1600 leads by 8.9%. The Quadro FX 350M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon X1600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 350M) vs 4,608 (Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M) vs 19.4 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600).

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRadeon X1600
G3D Mark Score
45
49+9%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
240
4608+1820%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
19.4 TFLOPS+3018%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
80
288+260%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRadeon X1600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 350M has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 carries 512 MB. Radeon X1600 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350M and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600.

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRadeon X1600
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRadeon X1600
DirectX
9.0c
9_0c
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 350M) vs Avivo (Radeon X1600). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP1) vs Avivo.

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRadeon X1600
Encoder
None
Avivo
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP1)
Avivo
Codecs
MPEG-2,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 350M draws 189W versus the Radeon X1600's 255W — a 29.7% difference. The Quadro FX 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 350M) vs 350W (Radeon X1600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRadeon X1600
TDP
189W-26%
255W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon X1600 (2020 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRadeon X1600
MSRP
$199
Codename
GT200B
Navi 21
Release
November 11 2008
October 28 2020
Ranking
#815
#34

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.