
Quadro FX 350M

Radeon X1600
Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon X1600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon X1600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 350M
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 189W instead of 255W, a 66W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (45 vs 49).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon X1600
2020Why buy it
- ✅+8.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Quadro FX 350M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌34.9% higher power demand at 255W vs 189W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 350M
The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon X1600
The Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2105 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 350M scores 45 versus the Radeon X1600's 49 — the Radeon X1600 leads by 8.9%. The Quadro FX 350M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon X1600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 350M) vs 4,608 (Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M) vs 19.4 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600).
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 45 | 49+9% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 4608+1820% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 19.4 TFLOPS+3018% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 288+260% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 350M has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 carries 512 MB. Radeon X1600 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350M and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 350M) vs Avivo (Radeon X1600). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP1) vs Avivo.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Avivo |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP1) | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 350M draws 189W versus the Radeon X1600's 255W — a 29.7% difference. The Quadro FX 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 350M) vs 350W (Radeon X1600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-26% | 255W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon X1600 (2020 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 21 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #815 | #34 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














