GeForce FX 5900XT vs Quadro FX 350M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5900XT vs Quadro FX 350M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5900XT vs Quadro FX 350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5900XT

2011

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (40 vs 45).
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌93.1% higher power demand at 365W vs 189W.

Quadro FX 350M

2008

Why buy it

✅+12.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 189W instead of 365W, a 176W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 350M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 12.5% in PassMark G3D (45 vs 40), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX 5900XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2011 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 350M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 350M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce FX 5900XT has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX 5900XT vs Quadro FX 350M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5900XT

The GeForce FX 5900XT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points. Launch price was $699.

Quadro FX 350M

The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5900XT scores 40 versus the Quadro FX 350M's 45 — the Quadro FX 350M leads by 12.5%. The GeForce FX 5900XT is built on Rankine while the Quadro FX 350M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350M). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M).

Feature	GeForce FX 5900XT	Quadro FX 350M
G3D Mark Score	40	45+13%
Architecture	Rankine	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	1024 ×2+327%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.244 TFLOPS ×2+100%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	48 ×2+50%	32
TMUs	64 ×2	80+25%
L2 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5900XT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 350M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce FX 5900XT	Quadro FX 350M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5900XT has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 350M carries 256 MB. Quadro FX 350M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5900XT and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350M. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 350M) — the GeForce FX 5900XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5900XT	Quadro FX 350M
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.25 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce FX 5900XT	Quadro FX 350M
DirectX	9.0a	9.0c
OpenGL	1.5	2.1+40%
Max Displays	1	1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5900XT draws 365W versus the Quadro FX 350M's 189W — a 63.5% difference. The Quadro FX 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 218mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce FX 5900XT	Quadro FX 350M
TDP	365W	189W-48%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	218mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.2+100%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce FX 5900XT (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce FX 5900XT	Quadro FX 350M
MSRP	$0	—
Codename	GF110	GT200B
Release	March 24 2011	November 11 2008
Ranking	#555	#815

Search GeForce FX 5900XT on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 350M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.