
GeForce FX 5900XT vs Radeon Xpress 1250

GeForce FX 5900XT
Popular choices:

Radeon Xpress 1250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Xpress 1250 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5900XT.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5900XT | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Xpress 1250 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5900XT and Radeon Xpress 1250

GeForce FX 5900XT
The GeForce FX 5900XT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon Xpress 1250
The Radeon Xpress 1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 43 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5900XT scores 40 versus the Radeon Xpress 1250's 43 — the Radeon Xpress 1250 leads by 7.5%. The GeForce FX 5900XT is built on Rankine while the Radeon Xpress 1250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 384 (Radeon Xpress 1250). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1250).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900XT | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 40 | 43+8% |
| Architecture | Rankine | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 ×2+167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2+54% | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 ×2+500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64 ×2+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+1011% | 0.09 MB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900XT | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5900XT comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1250 has 512 MB. The Radeon Xpress 1250 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 256 KB (Radeon Xpress 1250) — the GeForce FX 5900XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900XT | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 9_0b (Radeon Xpress 1250). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900XT | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5900XT draws 365W versus the Radeon Xpress 1250's 65W — a 139.5% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1250). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 218mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900XT | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 365W | 65W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 218mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.7+600% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5900XT launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon Xpress 1250 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The GeForce FX 5900XT costs 100+% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 0.9 (Radeon Xpress 1250) — the GeForce FX 5900XT offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Xpress 1250 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900XT | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.9 |
| Codename | GF110 | Oland |
| Release | March 24 2011 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #555 | #871 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











