GeForce FX 5900XT vs GeForce Go 7200

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5900XT

2011Core: 607 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7200

2014Core: 993 MHz
Similar parts
······

GeForce FX 5900XT vs GeForce Go 7200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5900XT vs GeForce Go 7200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5900XT vs GeForce Go 7200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5900XT

2011

Why buy it

  • 98.4% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (128 MB vs 65 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (40 vs 45).
  • 2011 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 470.3% higher power demand at 365W vs 64W.

GeForce Go 7200

2014

Why buy it

  • +12.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Draws 64W instead of 365W, a 301W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 128 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce Go 7200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 12.5% in PassMark G3D (45 vs 40), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5900XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 128 MB vs 65 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 7200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce Go 7200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce FX 5900XT has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX 5900XT vs GeForce Go 7200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5900XT

The GeForce FX 5900XT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7200

The GeForce Go 7200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $89.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5900XT scores 40 versus the GeForce Go 7200's 45 — the GeForce Go 7200 leads by 12.5%. The GeForce FX 5900XT is built on Rankine while the GeForce Go 7200 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7200). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7200).

FeatureGeForce FX 5900XTGeForce Go 7200
G3D Mark Score
40
45+13%
Architecture
Rankine
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024 ×2+167%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.244 TFLOPS ×2+63%
0.7626 TFLOPS
ROPs
48 ×2+200%
16
TMUs
64 ×2+100%
32
L1 Cache
1 MB+3233%
0.03 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5900XTGeForce Go 7200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5900XT has 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7200 carries 65 MB. GeForce FX 5900XT gives you 98.4% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5900XT and 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7200. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 256 KB (GeForce Go 7200) — the GeForce FX 5900XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5900XTGeForce Go 7200
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB+98%
0.063 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7200). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce FX 5900XTGeForce Go 7200
DirectX
9.0a
9.0c
OpenGL
1.5
2.1+40%
Max Displays
1
1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5900XT draws 365W versus the GeForce Go 7200's 64W — a 140.3% difference. The GeForce Go 7200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7200). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 218mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce FX 5900XTGeForce Go 7200
TDP
365W
64W-82%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
218mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.7+600%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce Go 7200 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce FX 5900XTGeForce Go 7200
MSRP
$0
Codename
GF110
GK107
Release
March 24 2011
May 29 2014
Ranking
#555
#777

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.