GeForce FX 5900XT vs Radeon X1250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon X1250 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The Radeon X1250 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX 5900XT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce FX 5900XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1250 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce FX 5900XT	Radeon X1250
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+8.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5900XT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce FX 5900XT Benchmark Check

Radeon X1250 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5900XT and Radeon X1250

GeForce FX 5900XT

The GeForce FX 5900XT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon X1250

The Radeon X1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5900XT scores 40 versus the Radeon X1250's 37 — the GeForce FX 5900XT leads by 8.1%. The GeForce FX 5900XT is built on Rankine while the Radeon X1250 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 512 (Radeon X1250). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon X1250).

Feature	GeForce FX 5900XT	Radeon X1250
G3D Mark Score	40+8%	37
Architecture	Rankine	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1024 ×2+100%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.244 TFLOPS ×2+3%	1.211 TFLOPS
ROPs	48 ×2+200%	16
TMUs	64 ×2+100%	32
L1 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce FX 5900XT	Radeon X1250
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5900XT comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1250 has 512 MB. The Radeon X1250 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 256 KB (Radeon X1250) — the GeForce FX 5900XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5900XT	Radeon X1250
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 9.0b (Radeon X1250). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce FX 5900XT	Radeon X1250
DirectX	9.0a	9.0b
OpenGL	1.5	2.0+33%
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5900XT draws 365W versus the Radeon X1250's 50W — a 151.8% difference. The Radeon X1250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 350W (Radeon X1250). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 218mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce FX 5900XT	Radeon X1250
TDP	365W	50W-86%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	218mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	70
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.7+600%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce FX 5900XT launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon X1250 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The GeForce FX 5900XT costs 100+% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 0.8 (Radeon X1250) — the GeForce FX 5900XT offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon X1250 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).