Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon X1050

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 350M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1050

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon X1050 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon X1050 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon X1050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 350M

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (45 vs 49).
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 243.6% higher power demand at 189W vs 55W.

Radeon X1050

2025

Why buy it

  • +8.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 55W instead of 189W, a 134W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1050 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 8.9% in PassMark G3D (49 vs 45), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1050 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 55nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2008. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1050 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 350M vs Radeon X1050 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 350M

The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon X1050

The Radeon X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 350M scores 45 versus the Radeon X1050's 49 — the Radeon X1050 leads by 8.9%. The Quadro FX 350M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon X1050 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 55 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 350M) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1050). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Radeon X1050).

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRadeon X1050
G3D Mark Score
45
49+9%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
55 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
240
2048+753%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
11.47 TFLOPS+1744%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
80
128+60%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRadeon X1050
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350M and 64-bit on the Radeon X1050. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 350M) vs 8 MB (Radeon X1050) — the Radeon X1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRadeon X1050
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M) vs 9_0b (Radeon X1050). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRadeon X1050
DirectX
9.0c
9_0b
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 350M draws 189W versus the Radeon X1050's 55W — a 109.8% difference. The Radeon X1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 350M) vs 350W (Radeon X1050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 165mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRadeon X1050
TDP
189W
55W-71%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
165mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.9+350%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon X1050 (2025 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRadeon X1050
MSRP
$0
Codename
GT200B
Strix Halo
Release
November 11 2008
January 6 2025
Ranking
#815
#126

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.