Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

MOBILITY RADEON X600 vs Quadro FX 350M

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

MOBILITY RADEON X600

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 350M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

MOBILITY RADEON X600 vs Quadro FX 350M Performance Spectrum

MOBILITY RADEON X600
0.125 GB 50
50
+11.1%
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9700
brand logoMobility Radeon X1450
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700
brand logoMobility Radeon X1400
brand logoRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700
Quadro FX 350M
0.25 GB 189
45
0.0%
brand logoGeForce FX 5700LE
brand logoGeForce 6100
brand logoGeForce PCX 5750
brand logoGeForce FX 5900XT
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY RADEON X600 vs Quadro FX 350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY RADEON X600

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅+11.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 350M

2008

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (45 vs 50).
  • ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • ❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
MOBILITY RADEON X600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 11.1% in PassMark G3D (50 vs 45), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
MOBILITY RADEON X600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON X600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

MOBILITY RADEON X600 vs Quadro FX 350M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON X600

The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 50 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 350M

The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON X600 scores 50 versus the Quadro FX 350M's 45 — the MOBILITY RADEON X600 leads by 11.1%. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 350M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350M). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON X600Quadro FX 350M
G3D Mark Score
50+11%
45
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
800+233%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS+80%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
80+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON X600Quadro FX 350M
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON X600 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 350M carries 256 MB. Quadro FX 350M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X600 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350M.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON X600Quadro FX 350M
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.25 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON X600Quadro FX 350M
DirectX
9.0b
9.0c
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
2.0
2.1+5%
Max Displays
0
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs None (Quadro FX 350M). Decoder: Video Shader vs PureVideo HD (VP1). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 350M).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON X600Quadro FX 350M
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
Video Shader
PureVideo HD (VP1)
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON X600 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 350M's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON X600Quadro FX 350M
TDP
50W-74%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75-6%
80
Perf/Watt
1.0+400%
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is MOBILITY RADEON X600 (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON X600Quadro FX 350M
MSRP
$50
—
Codename
Broadway
GT200B
Release
January 7 2010
November 11 2008
Ranking
#846
#815
Search MOBILITY RADEON X600 on AmazonSearch Quadro FX 350M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.