MOBILITY RADEON X600 vs RADEON E2400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY RADEON X600 vs RADEON E2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

MOBILITY RADEON X600 vs RADEON E2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY RADEON X600

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 92.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON E2400

2017

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON E2400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4% in PassMark G3D (52 vs 50), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

MOBILITY RADEON X600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

MOBILITY RADEON X600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 92.3% (1.0 vs 0.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. RADEON E2400 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

MOBILITY RADEON X600 vs RADEON E2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY RADEON X600

The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 50 points.

RADEON E2400

The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The MOBILITY RADEON X600 scores 50 and the RADEON E2400 reaches 52 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON E2400 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 384 (RADEON E2400). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON X600	RADEON E2400
G3D Mark Score	50	52+4%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	800+108%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS+23%	0.9085 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+67%	24
L1 Cache	80 KB	96 KB+20%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON X600	RADEON E2400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON X600 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON E2400 carries 512 MB. RADEON E2400 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X600 and 64-bit on the RADEON E2400. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 512 KB (RADEON E2400) — the RADEON E2400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON X600	RADEON E2400
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON X600 draws 50W versus the RADEON E2400's 50W — a 0% difference. The RADEON E2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 350W (RADEON E2400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON X600	RADEON E2400
TDP	50W	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	1.0	1.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON X600 came in at $50, while the RADEON E2400 launched at $100. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON X600 was 50% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 0.5 (RADEON E2400) — the MOBILITY RADEON X600 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is RADEON E2400 (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON X600	RADEON E2400
MSRP	$50-50%	$100
Performance per Dollar	1.0+100%	0.5
Codename	Broadway	Lexa
Release	January 7 2010	April 20 2017
Ranking	#846	#773

Search MOBILITY RADEON X600 on Amazon

Search RADEON E2400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.