CPU
GPU
MOBILITY RADEON X600
Popular choices:
RADEON E2400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is positioned at rank 693 and the RADEON E2400 is on rank 351, so the RADEON E2400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X600
Performance Per Dollar RADEON E2400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON E2400 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The RADEON E2400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON E2400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON X600.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the MOBILITY RADEON X600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $100), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 861.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+861.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON X600 and RADEON E2400
MOBILITY RADEON X600
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 50 points.
RADEON E2400
The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 scores 50 and the RADEON E2400 reaches 52 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON E2400 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 384 (RADEON E2400). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 50 | 52+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+23% | 0.9085 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 96 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON E2400 has 512 MB. The RADEON E2400 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 512 KB (RADEON E2400) — the RADEON E2400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 draws 50W versus the RADEON E2400's 50W — a 0% difference. The RADEON E2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 350W (RADEON E2400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the RADEON E2400 launched at $100 and now averages $100. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 costs 90% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.0 (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 0.5 (RADEON E2400) — the MOBILITY RADEON X600 offers 900% better value. The RADEON E2400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-50% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-90% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.0+900% | 0.5 |
| Codename | Broadway | Lexa |
| Release | January 7 2010 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #846 | #773 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MOBILITY RADEON X600 and RADEON E2400
