
MOBILITY RADEON X600

Radeon X1600
MOBILITY RADEON X600 vs Radeon X1600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
MOBILITY RADEON X600 vs Radeon X1600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
MOBILITY RADEON X600 vs Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
MOBILITY RADEON X600
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 306.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 255W, a 205W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon X1600
2020Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅MOBILITY RADEON X600 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌298% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌410% higher power demand at 255W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON X600 vs Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY RADEON X600
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 50 points.

Radeon X1600
The Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2105 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.
Graphics Performance
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 scores 50 and the Radeon X1600 reaches 49 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon X1600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 4,608 (Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 19.4 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 50+2% | 49 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 4608+476% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 19.4 TFLOPS+1632% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 288+620% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 carries 512 MB. Radeon X1600 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X600 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0b | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs Avivo (Radeon X1600). Decoder: Video Shader vs Avivo.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Avivo |
| Decoder | Video Shader | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1600's 255W — a 134.4% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 350W (Radeon X1600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-80% | 255W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0+400% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON X600 came in at $50, while the Radeon X1600 launched at $199. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON X600 was 74.9% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 0.2 (Radeon X1600) — the MOBILITY RADEON X600 offers 400% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1600 (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-75% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0+400% | 0.2 |
| Codename | Broadway | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #846 | #34 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














