CPU
GPU
MOBILITY RADEON X600
Popular choices:
Radeon Xpress 1300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is positioned at rank #693 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X600
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Xpress 1300 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The Radeon Xpress 1300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Xpress 1300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON X600.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $49 for the Radeon Xpress 1300, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 371.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+371.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON X600 and Radeon Xpress 1300
MOBILITY RADEON X600
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 50 points.
Radeon Xpress 1300
The Radeon Xpress 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points.
Graphics Performance
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 scores 50 and the Radeon Xpress 1300 reaches 52 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon Xpress 1300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 50 | 52+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1280+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 4.224 TFLOPS+277% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1300 has 512 MB. The Radeon Xpress 1300 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300) — the Radeon Xpress 1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 9.0c (Radeon Xpress 1300). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0b | 9.0c |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs None (Radeon Xpress 1300). Decoder: Video Shader vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | Video Shader | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 draws 50W versus the Radeon Xpress 1300's 85W — a 51.9% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-41% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0+67% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon Xpress 1300 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.0 (MOBILITY RADEON X600) vs 1.1 (Radeon Xpress 1300) — the MOBILITY RADEON X600 offers 354.5% better value. The Radeon Xpress 1300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X600 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-80% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.0+355% | 1.1 |
| Codename | Broadway | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #846 | #351 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MOBILITY RADEON X600 and Radeon Xpress 1300
