GeForce FX Go5700 vs Quadro FX 350M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs Quadro FX 350M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs Quadro FX 350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX Go5700

2010

Why buy it

✅+13.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌15.9% higher power demand at 219W vs 189W.

Quadro FX 350M

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 189W instead of 219W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (45 vs 51).
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce FX Go5700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 13.3% in PassMark G3D (51 vs 45), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX Go5700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce FX Go5700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs Quadro FX 350M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX Go5700

The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro FX 350M

The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go5700 scores 51 versus the Quadro FX 350M's 45 — the GeForce FX Go5700 leads by 13.3%. The GeForce FX Go5700 is built on Rankine while the Quadro FX 350M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350M). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M).

Feature	GeForce FX Go5700	Quadro FX 350M
G3D Mark Score	51+13%	45
Architecture	Rankine	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	480+100%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.405 TFLOPS+126%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	60	80+33%
L2 Cache	640 KB+150%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX Go5700 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 350M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce FX Go5700	Quadro FX 350M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX Go5700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 350M carries 256 MB. GeForce FX Go5700 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go5700 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350M. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 350M) — the GeForce FX Go5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX Go5700	Quadro FX 350M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	640 KB+150%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce FX Go5700	Quadro FX 350M
DirectX	9.0a	9.0c
OpenGL	2.1	2.1
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs None (Quadro FX 350M). Decoder: VPE 3.0 vs PureVideo HD (VP1). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 350M).

Feature	GeForce FX Go5700	Quadro FX 350M
Encoder	VPE 3.0	None
Decoder	VPE 3.0	PureVideo HD (VP1)
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2,WMV9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX Go5700 draws 219W versus the Quadro FX 350M's 189W — a 14.7% difference. The Quadro FX 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.