Quadro FX 350M vs RADEON X600 SE

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 350M

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
AMD

RADEON X600 SE

2023Core: 1626 MHzBoost: 2495 MHz

Quadro FX 350M vs RADEON X600 SE Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 350M vs RADEON X600 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 350M vs RADEON X600 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 350M

2008

Why buy it

  • βœ…Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (45 vs 49).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌43.2% higher power demand at 189W vs 132W.

RADEON X600 SE

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…+8.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • βœ…Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • βœ…100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • βœ…Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020βˆ’2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • βœ…Draws 132W instead of 189W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON X600 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 8.9% in PassMark G3D (49 vs 45), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON X600 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, and 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON X600 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 350M vs RADEON X600 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 350M

The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

RADEON X600 SE

The RADEON X600 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 350M scores 45 versus the RADEON X600 SE's 49 β€” the RADEON X600 SE leads by 8.9%. The Quadro FX 350M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON X600 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 350M) vs 1,792 (RADEON X600 SE). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M) vs 8.942 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 SE).

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRADEON X600 SE
G3D Mark Score
45
49+9%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
240
1792+647%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
8.942 TFLOPS+1337%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
80
112+40%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRADEON X600 SE
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 350M has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X600 SE carries 512 MB. RADEON X600 SE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350M and 64-bit on the RADEON X600 SE. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 350M) vs 2 MB (RADEON X600 SE) β€” the RADEON X600 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRADEON X600 SE
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 350M draws 189W versus the RADEON X600 SE's 132W β€” a 35.5% difference. The RADEON X600 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 350M) vs 350W (RADEON X600 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRADEON X600 SE
TDP
189W
132W-30%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
0mm
β€”
Height
0mm
β€”
Slots
0
β€”
Temp (Load)
80
β€”
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.4+100%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON X600 SE (2023 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 350MRADEON X600 SE
MSRP
β€”
$100
Codename
GT200B
Navi 23
Release
November 11 2008
December 8 2023
Ranking
#815
#176

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.