
Quadro FX 350M

RADEON X600 SE
Quadro FX 350M vs RADEON X600 SE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 350M vs RADEON X600 SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 350M vs RADEON X600 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 350M
2008Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (45 vs 49).
- βLess VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- β43.2% higher power demand at 189W vs 132W.
RADEON X600 SE
2023Why buy it
- β +8.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- β Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020β2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- β Draws 132W instead of 189W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βFewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 350M vs RADEON X600 SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 350M
The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

RADEON X600 SE
The RADEON X600 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 350M scores 45 versus the RADEON X600 SE's 49 β the RADEON X600 SE leads by 8.9%. The Quadro FX 350M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON X600 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 350M) vs 1,792 (RADEON X600 SE). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M) vs 8.942 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 SE).
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | RADEON X600 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 45 | 49+9% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1792+647% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 8.942 TFLOPS+1337% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | RADEON X600 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 350M has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X600 SE carries 512 MB. RADEON X600 SE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350M and 64-bit on the RADEON X600 SE. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 350M) vs 2 MB (RADEON X600 SE) β the RADEON X600 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | RADEON X600 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 350M draws 189W versus the RADEON X600 SE's 132W β a 35.5% difference. The RADEON X600 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 350M) vs 350W (RADEON X600 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | RADEON X600 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 132W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.4+100% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RADEON X600 SE (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | RADEON X600 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | β | $100 |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 23 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | December 8 2023 |
| Ranking | #815 | #176 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














