Quadro FX 350M vs MOBILITY RADEON X600
Quadro FX 350M
Popular choices:
MOBILITY RADEON X600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 350M is positioned at rank 228 and the MOBILITY RADEON X600 is on rank 693, so the Quadro FX 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 350M
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 11.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 350M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 350M | MOBILITY RADEON X600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-11.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+11.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the MOBILITY RADEON X600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 350M and MOBILITY RADEON X600
Quadro FX 350M
The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.
MOBILITY RADEON X600
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 50 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 350M scores 45 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X600's 50 — the MOBILITY RADEON X600 leads by 11.1%. The Quadro FX 350M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON X600 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 350M) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X600). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X600).
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | MOBILITY RADEON X600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 45 | 50+11% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 800+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+80% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | MOBILITY RADEON X600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 350M comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON X600 has 128 MB. The Quadro FX 350M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | MOBILITY RADEON X600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M) vs 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X600). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | MOBILITY RADEON X600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0b |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.1+5% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 350M) vs None (MOBILITY RADEON X600). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP1) vs Video Shader. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 350M) vs MPEG-2 (MOBILITY RADEON X600).
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | MOBILITY RADEON X600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP1) | Video Shader |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 350M draws 189W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X600's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 350M) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75.
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | MOBILITY RADEON X600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 50W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 1.0+400% |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 350M | MOBILITY RADEON X600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10 |
| Codename | GT200B | Broadway |
| Release | November 11 2008 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #815 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 350M and MOBILITY RADEON X600
