
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 vs Radeon X1600

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Popular choices:

Radeon X1600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 16.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700.
| Insight | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-16.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+16.7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $49 for the Radeon X1600, it costs 39% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 40% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+40%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 and Radeon X1600

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Radeon X1600
The Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2105 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 scores 42 versus the Radeon X1600's 49 — the Radeon X1600 leads by 16.7%. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the Radeon X1600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 4,608 (Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 19.4 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 2105 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 42 | 49+17% |
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 4608+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 47.84 TFLOPS+147% | 19.4 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+39% | 2105 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256 | 288+13% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0 | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs Avivo (Radeon X1600). Decoder: VideoShader vs Avivo.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Avivo |
| Decoder | VideoShader | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 draws 300W versus the Radeon X1600's 255W — a 16.2% difference. The Radeon X1600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 350W (Radeon X1600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 175mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 255W-15% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 175mm | 168mm |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.2+100% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon X1600 launched at $199 and now averages $49. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 costs 38.8% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 1.0 (Radeon X1600) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers 40% better value. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-39% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4+40% | 1.0 |
| Codename | Navi 48 | Navi 21 |
| Release | July 23 2025 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #23 | #34 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















