A6-6310 vs Pentium P6300

A6-6310 vs Pentium P6300 Performance Spectrum

A6-6310

4 / 4

1,676

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium P6300

2 / 2

1,685

+0.5%

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-6310 vs Pentium P6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-6310 vs Pentium P6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-6310

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R4, while Pentium P6300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,676 vs 1,685).

Pentium P6300

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while A6-6310 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-6310 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-6310 better than Pentium P6300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-6310 is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6300 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-6310 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-6310 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium P6300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-6310 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-6310 vs Pentium P6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-6310

The A6-6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1865. Passmark benchmark score: 1,676 points. Launch price was $70.

Pentium P6300

The Pentium P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.27 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,685 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-6310 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium P6300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-6310 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-6310 versus 0.27 GHz on the Pentium P6300 — a 159.6% clock advantage for the A6-6310 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.27 GHz). The A6-6310 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium P6300 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-6310 scores 1,676 against the Pentium P6300's 1,685 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium P6300.

Feature	A6-6310	Pentium P6300
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+789%	0.27 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.27 GHz+26%
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Beema (2014)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,676	1,685
Geekbench 6 Single	220	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-6310 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium P6300 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A6-6310	Pentium P6300
Socket	FT3	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-6310) / not specified (Pentium P6300). The A6-6310 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R4), while the Pentium P6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-6310 targets Entry Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-6310 rivals Pentium N3530.