Radeon HD 6310 vs T1200 Mobile
Radeon HD 6310
Popular choices:
T1200 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6310 is positioned at rank 300 and the T1200 Mobile is on rank 10, so the T1200 Mobile offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6310
Performance Per Dollar T1200 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T1200 Mobile is significantly newer (2021 vs 2011). The T1200 Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6310 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The T1200 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6297.5% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6310.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6310 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6297.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6297.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the T1200 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6310 and T1200 Mobile
Radeon HD 6310
The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.
T1200 Mobile
The T1200 Mobile is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,805 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 6310 scores 122 versus the T1200 Mobile's 7,805 — the T1200 Mobile leads by 6297.5%. The Radeon HD 6310 is built on TeraScale 3 while the T1200 Mobile uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310) vs 1,024 (T1200 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6310 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 122 | 7,805+6298% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Turing |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+25% | 1024 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6310 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6310 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the T1200 Mobile has 4 GB. The T1200 Mobile offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6310 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6310 draws 186W versus the T1200 Mobile's 95W — a 64.8% difference. The T1200 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6310) vs 350W (T1200 Mobile). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6310 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 186W | 95W-49% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 82.2+11643% |
Value Analysis
The T1200 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6310 | T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | — |
| Codename | Cayman | — |
| Release | December 1 2011 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #598 | #325 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6310 and T1200 Mobile
