Radeon HD 2400 vs Radeon HD 6310

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 2400 vs Radeon HD 6310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 2400 vs Radeon HD 6310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 2400

2009

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
58% HIGHER MSRP
$79 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6310

2011

Why buy it

✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
✅Delivers 59.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (122 vs 121), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 2400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $79, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 59.3% (2.4 vs 1.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 2400 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 2400 vs Radeon HD 6310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 2400

The Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 121 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon HD 6310

The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 2400 scores 121 and the Radeon HD 6310 reaches 122 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 2400 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 6310 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 2400) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6310).

Feature	Radeon HD 2400	Radeon HD 6310
G3D Mark Score	121	122
Architecture	TeraScale	TeraScale 3
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	800	1280+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.36 TFLOPS	1.92 TFLOPS+41%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	80+100%
L1 Cache	160 KB	320 KB+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 2400	Radeon HD 6310
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon HD 2400 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6310. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 2400) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6310) — the Radeon HD 6310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 2400	Radeon HD 6310
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2400 draws 190W versus the Radeon HD 6310's 186W — a 2.1% difference. The Radeon HD 6310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6310). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon HD 2400	Radeon HD 6310
TDP	190W	186W-2%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	0.6	0.7+17%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 2400 came in at $79, while the Radeon HD 6310 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6310 was 36.7% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (Radeon HD 2400) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) — the Radeon HD 6310 offers 60% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 6310 (2011 vs 2009).

Feature	Radeon HD 2400	Radeon HD 6310
MSRP	$79	$50-37%
Performance per Dollar	1.5	2.4+60%
Codename	RV790	Cayman
Release	April 2 2009	December 1 2011
Ranking	#762	#598

Search Radeon HD 2400 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.