Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 2400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1400

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 150W instead of 190W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
911.4% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Radeon HD 2400

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $720 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 886.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌26.7% higher power demand at 190W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 1400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (124 vs 121), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 1400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 2400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $720 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 886.9% (1.5 vs 0.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 2400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 1400 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1400

The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon HD 2400

The Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 121 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1400 scores 124 and the Radeon HD 2400 reaches 121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 2400 uses TeraScale, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 800 (Radeon HD 2400). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400).

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 2400
G3D Mark Score	124+2%	121
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale
Process Node	55 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	192	800+317%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	1.36 TFLOPS+194%
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L2 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 2400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1400 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2400 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 2400 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1400 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 2400. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 1400) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 2400) — the Radeon HD 2400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 2400
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1400 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 2400's 190W — a 23.5% difference. The Quadro FX 1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 2400
TDP	150W-21%	190W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	0.8+33%	0.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 1400 came in at $799, while the Radeon HD 2400 launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon HD 2400 was 90.1% cheaper ($720 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 1.5 (Radeon HD 2400) — the Radeon HD 2400 offers 650% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 2400 (2009 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 2400
MSRP	$799	$79-90%
Performance per Dollar	0.2	1.5+650%
Codename	GT200B	RV790
Release	November 11 2008	April 2 2009
Ranking	#884	#762

Search Quadro FX 1400 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 2400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.