
Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 7310

Quadro FX 1400
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7310
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1400 is positioned at rank 410 and the Radeon HD 7310 is on rank 193, so the Radeon HD 7310 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1400
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7310
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7310 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1400.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 7310 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7310 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7310 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $30), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 519.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 7310 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+519.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1400 and Radeon HD 7310

Quadro FX 1400
The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon HD 7310
The Radeon HD 7310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 128 points. Launch price was $59.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 1400 scores 124 and the Radeon HD 7310 reaches 128 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7310 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 384 (Radeon HD 7310). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7310).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 7310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 124 | 128+3% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 0.6144 TFLOPS+33% |
| ROPs | 24+200% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 7310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 1400 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7310 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 7310 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 1400) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7310) — the Radeon HD 7310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 7310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1400 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7310's 47W — a 104.6% difference. The Radeon HD 7310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7310). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 7310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 47W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8 | 2.7+238% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 1400 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 7310 launched at $20 and now averages $5. The Radeon HD 7310 costs 83.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.1 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 25.6 (Radeon HD 7310) — the Radeon HD 7310 offers 524.4% better value. The Radeon HD 7310 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 7310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $20-97% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $5-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.1 | 25.6+524% |
| Codename | GT200B | Cape Verde |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #884 | #841 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















