Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 6310

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 6310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 6310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1400

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 150W instead of 186W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1498% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6310

2011

Why buy it

✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $749 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1472.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌24% higher power demand at 186W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 1400 instead at 124 vs 122, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 1400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $749 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1472.2% (2.4 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 1400 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 6310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1400

The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon HD 6310

The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1400 scores 124 and the Radeon HD 6310 reaches 122 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6310 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6310).

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 6310
G3D Mark Score	124+2%	122
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	192	1280+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	1.92 TFLOPS+315%
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	64	80+25%
L2 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 6310
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1400 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6310 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6310 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1400 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6310. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 1400) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6310) — the Radeon HD 6310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 6310
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1400 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6310's 186W — a 21.4% difference. The Quadro FX 1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6310). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 6310
TDP	150W-19%	186W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	0.8+14%	0.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 1400 came in at $799, while the Radeon HD 6310 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6310 was 93.7% cheaper ($749 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) — the Radeon HD 6310 offers 1100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 6310 (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 6310
MSRP	$799	$50-94%
Performance per Dollar	0.2	2.4+1100%
Codename	GT200B	Cayman
Release	November 11 2008	December 1 2011
Ranking	#884	#598

Search Quadro FX 1400 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.