Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 6310
Quadro FX 1400
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6310
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1400 is positioned at rank 410 and the Radeon HD 6310 is on rank 300, so the Radeon HD 6310 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1400
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6310
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 1400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6310 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 1400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 1400 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 69.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+69.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1400 and Radeon HD 6310
Quadro FX 1400
The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Radeon HD 6310
The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 1400 scores 124 and the Radeon HD 6310 reaches 122 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6310 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6310).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 124+2% | 122 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1280+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+315% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 1400 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6310 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 6310 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 1400) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6310) — the Radeon HD 6310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1400 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6310's 186W — a 21.4% difference. The Quadro FX 1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6310). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-19% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8+14% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 1400 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 6310 launched at $50 and now averages $50. The Quadro FX 1400 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.1 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) — the Quadro FX 1400 offers 70.8% better value. The Radeon HD 6310 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $50-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-40% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.1+71% | 2.4 |
| Codename | GT200B | Cayman |
| Release | November 11 2008 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #884 | #598 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 1400 and Radeon HD 6310
