
Quadro FX 1400 vs GeForce Go 7600

Quadro FX 1400
Popular choices:

GeForce Go 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1400 is positioned at rank 410 and the GeForce Go 7600 is on rank 76, so the GeForce Go 7600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1400.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1400 | GeForce Go 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1400 and GeForce Go 7600

Quadro FX 1400
The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.

GeForce Go 7600
The GeForce Go 7600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 128 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 1400 scores 124 and the GeForce Go 7600 reaches 128 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce Go 7600 uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 1,152 (GeForce Go 7600). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400) vs 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7600).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | GeForce Go 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 124 | 128+3% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1152+500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 2.378 TFLOPS+414% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 64 | 96+50% |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | GeForce Go 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 1400 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7600 has 512 MB. The GeForce Go 7600 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 1400) vs 512 KB (GeForce Go 7600) — the GeForce Go 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | GeForce Go 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1400 draws 150W versus the GeForce Go 7600's 170W — a 12.5% difference. The Quadro FX 1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1400) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | GeForce Go 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-12% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 7600 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | GeForce Go 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | GT200B | GK104 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | June 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #884 | #450 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











