Quadro FX 1400 vs GeForce G210M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1400 is positioned at rank 410 and the GeForce G210M is on rank 436, so the Quadro FX 1400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1400

#395

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

92331%

#410

Quadro FX 1400

MSRP: $799|Avg: $30

100%

#411

GRID K1

MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120

100%

#413

GRID P4-1Q

MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185

75%

#414

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

63%

#417

GRID M60-0B

MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900

56%

#418

Quadro FX 4500 X2

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

50%

#419

Quadro FX 5500

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30

50%

#420

Quadro FX 1000

MSRP: $500|Avg: $30

44%

#421

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

38%

#422

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

38%

#423

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

31%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

25%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

13%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce G210M

#426

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1683%

#428

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1526%

#429

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1522%

#433

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1384%

#434

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1374%

#436

GeForce G210M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#437

Radeon HD 8450G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

99%

#438

Radeon R3

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

97%

#439

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

97%

#441

Radeon HD 8550G + 8600M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

96%

#443

Radeon R9 M360

MSRP: $300|Avg: $81

94%

#444

Radeon HD 8550G + 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

93%

#445

Radeon R9 M365X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

92%

#446

GeForce 7800 GS

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

91%

#447

Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

91%

#448

Radeon R9 M265X

MSRP: $200|Avg: $30

91%

#449

Mobility Radeon HD 5165

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

90%

#450

Radeon R5 M435

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

89%

#451

Radeon E8860

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce G210M is significantly newer (2016 vs 2008). The GeForce G210M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 1400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce G210M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1400.

Insight	Quadro FX 1400	GeForce G210M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce G210M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 1400 Benchmark Check

GeForce G210M Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1400 and GeForce G210M

Quadro FX 1400

The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.

GeForce G210M

The GeForce G210M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1400 scores 124 and the GeForce G210M reaches 129 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce G210M uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 256 (GeForce G210M). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G210M).

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	GeForce G210M
G3D Mark Score	124	129+4%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	256+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	0.5084 TFLOPS+10%
ROPs	24+200%	8
TMUs	64+167%	24
L2 Cache	0.19 MB	1 MB+426%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	GeForce G210M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1400 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce G210M has 512 MB. The GeForce G210M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 1400) vs 1 MB (GeForce G210M) — the GeForce G210M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	GeForce G210M
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.19 MB	1 MB+426%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1400 draws 150W versus the GeForce G210M's 16W — a 161.4% difference. The GeForce G210M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1400) vs 350W (GeForce G210M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.