Quadro FX 1400 vs GeForce 205
Quadro FX 1400
Popular choices:
GeForce 205
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1400 is positioned at rank 410 and the GeForce 205 is on rank 614, so the Quadro FX 1400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 205
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 205 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The GeForce 205 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 1400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 205 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1400.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1400 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 205 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $30 for the Quadro FX 1400, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 103.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1400 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+103.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1400 and GeForce 205
Quadro FX 1400
The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.
GeForce 205
The GeForce 205 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 126 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 1400 scores 124 and the GeForce 205 reaches 126 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 205 uses Pascal, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 384 (GeForce 205). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 205).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 124 | 126+2% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 0.7972 TFLOPS+72% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 1400 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 205 has 512 MB. The GeForce 205 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 1400) vs 512 KB (GeForce 205) — the GeForce 205 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1400 draws 150W versus the GeForce 205's 10W — a 175% difference. The GeForce 205 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1400) vs 350W (GeForce 205). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 10W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8 | 12.6+1475% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 1400 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce 205 launched at $50 and now averages $15. The GeForce 205 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.1 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 8.4 (GeForce 205) — the GeForce 205 offers 104.9% better value. The GeForce 205 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $50-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $15-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.1 | 8.4+105% |
| Codename | GT200B | GP108B |
| Release | November 11 2008 | February 20 2019 |
| Ranking | #884 | #643 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 1400 and GeForce 205
