Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 7290M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 7290M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 7290M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1400

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7290M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Radeon HD 7290M

2012

Why buy it

✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 7290M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 1400 instead at 124 vs 123, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 1400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 1400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 7290M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 7290M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1400

The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon HD 7290M

The Radeon HD 7290M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 123 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1400 scores 124 and the Radeon HD 7290M reaches 123 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7290M uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 7290M). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400) vs 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7290M).

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 7290M
G3D Mark Score	124	123
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	1280+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	2.176 TFLOPS+371%
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	64	80+25%
L2 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 7290M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1400 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7290M carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 7290M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1400 and System on the Radeon HD 7290M. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 1400) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 7290M) — the Radeon HD 7290M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 7290M
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1400 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7290M's 100W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 7290M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7290M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 7290M
TDP	150W	100W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	0.8	1.2+50%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 7290M (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 7290M
MSRP	$799	—
Codename	GT200B	Wimbledon
Release	November 11 2008	April 24 2012
Ranking	#884	#531

Search Quadro FX 1400 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7290M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.