
GeForce Go 7600

Quadro FX 1400
GeForce Go 7600 vs Quadro FX 1400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce Go 7600 vs Quadro FX 1400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce Go 7600 vs Quadro FX 1400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce Go 7600
2013Why buy it
- ✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quadro FX 1400
2008Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 7600 vs Quadro FX 1400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 7600
The GeForce Go 7600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 128 points. Launch price was $249.

Quadro FX 1400
The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 7600 scores 128 and the Quadro FX 1400 reaches 124 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7600 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce Go 7600) vs 192 (Quadro FX 1400). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7600) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7600 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 128+3% | 124 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+500% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.378 TFLOPS+414% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+167% | 192 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce Go 7600 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7600 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7600 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1400 carries 128 MB. GeForce Go 7600 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7600 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1400. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce Go 7600) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 1400) — the GeForce Go 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7600 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+167% | 192 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7600 draws 170W versus the Quadro FX 1400's 150W — a 12.5% difference. The Quadro FX 1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7600) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7600 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 150W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce Go 7600 (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7600 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Codename | GK104 | GT200B |
| Release | June 25 2013 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #450 | #884 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














