GeForce Go 7600 vs Quadro FX 1400

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7600

2013Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1400

2008Core: 602 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce Go 7600 vs Quadro FX 1400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7600 vs Quadro FX 1400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7600 vs Quadro FX 1400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7600

2013

Why buy it

  • 4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quadro FX 1400

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce Go 7600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (128 vs 124), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce Go 7600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 1400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 1400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 7600 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 7600 vs Quadro FX 1400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7600

The GeForce Go 7600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 128 points. Launch price was $249.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1400

The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 7600 scores 128 and the Quadro FX 1400 reaches 124 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7600 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce Go 7600) vs 192 (Quadro FX 1400). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7600) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400).

FeatureGeForce Go 7600Quadro FX 1400
G3D Mark Score
128+3%
124
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
1152+500%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.378 TFLOPS+414%
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+33%
24
TMUs
96+50%
64
L2 Cache
512 KB+167%
192 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 7600 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce Go 7600Quadro FX 1400
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 7600 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1400 carries 128 MB. GeForce Go 7600 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7600 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1400. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce Go 7600) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 1400) — the GeForce Go 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 7600Quadro FX 1400
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+300%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+167%
192 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7600 draws 170W versus the Quadro FX 1400's 150W — a 12.5% difference. The Quadro FX 1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7600) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce Go 7600Quadro FX 1400
TDP
170W
150W-12%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
0.8
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce Go 7600 (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce Go 7600Quadro FX 1400
MSRP
$799
Codename
GK104
GT200B
Release
June 25 2013
November 11 2008
Ranking
#450
#884

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.