GeForce G210M vs GeForce Go 7600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce G210M is positioned at rank 436 and the GeForce Go 7600 is on rank 76, so the GeForce Go 7600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce G210M

#426

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1683%

#428

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1526%

#429

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1522%

#433

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1384%

#434

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1374%

#436

GeForce G210M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#437

Radeon HD 8450G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

99%

#438

Radeon R3

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

97%

#439

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

97%

#441

Radeon HD 8550G + 8600M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

96%

#443

Radeon R9 M360

MSRP: $300|Avg: $81

94%

#444

Radeon HD 8550G + 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

93%

#445

Radeon R9 M365X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

92%

#446

GeForce 7800 GS

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

91%

#447

Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

91%

#448

Radeon R9 M265X

MSRP: $200|Avg: $30

91%

#449

Mobility Radeon HD 5165

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

90%

#450

Radeon R5 M435

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

89%

#451

Radeon E8860

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7600

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

283%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

272%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

269%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

269%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

268%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

267%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

263%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

262%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

260%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

259%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

256%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

255%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

251%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

251%

#61

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

313%

#75

GeForce RTX 3090

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $900

99%

#76

GeForce Go 7600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#76

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

95%

#77

GeForce RTX 4090

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1649

90%

#78

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1100

82%

#83

Radeon R9 A375

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

82%

#85

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

80%

#86

Radeon R5 A6-7480

MSRP: $35|Avg: $30

78%

#87

GeForce GT 710

MSRP: $35|Avg: $50

69%

#89

GeForce GT 740

MSRP: $89|Avg: $89

63%

#90

Radeon R7 A8-7680

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

62%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce G210M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7600.

Insight	GeForce G210M	GeForce Go 7600
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce G210M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce G210M Benchmark Check

GeForce Go 7600 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce G210M and GeForce Go 7600

GeForce G210M

The GeForce G210M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.

GeForce Go 7600

The GeForce Go 7600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 128 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G210M scores 129 and the GeForce Go 7600 reaches 128 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G210M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce Go 7600 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce G210M) vs 1,152 (GeForce Go 7600). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G210M) vs 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7600). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

Feature	GeForce G210M	GeForce Go 7600
G3D Mark Score	129	128
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	1152+350%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	2.378 TFLOPS+368%
Boost Clock	993 MHz	1033 MHz+4%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	96+300%
L1 Cache	128 KB+33%	96 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce G210M	GeForce Go 7600
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G210M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce Go 7600) — the GeForce G210M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce G210M	GeForce Go 7600
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce G210M) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7600). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce G210M	GeForce Go 7600
DirectX	10.1+12%	9.0c
Vulkan	None	None
OpenGL	3.3+57%	2.1
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce G210M) vs No (GeForce Go 7600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce G210M) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7600).

Feature	GeForce G210M	GeForce Go 7600
Encoder	No	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	PureVideo
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4	MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G210M draws 16W versus the GeForce Go 7600's 170W — a 165.6% difference. The GeForce G210M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G210M) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7600). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.