GeForce G210M vs RADEON X800 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G210M vs RADEON X800 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G210M vs RADEON X800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G210M

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 16W instead of 55W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RADEON X800 SE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

RADEON X800 SE

2025

Why buy it

✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌243.8% higher power demand at 55W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X800 SE is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (130 vs 129), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X800 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON X800 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce G210M vs RADEON X800 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G210M

The GeForce G210M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.

RADEON X800 SE

The RADEON X800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 130 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G210M scores 129 and the RADEON X800 SE reaches 130 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G210M is built on Maxwell while the RADEON X800 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce G210M) vs 2,560 (RADEON X800 SE). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G210M) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 SE). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce G210M	RADEON X800 SE
G3D Mark Score	129	130
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	256	2560+900%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	14.85 TFLOPS+2821%
Boost Clock	993 MHz	2900 MHz+192%
ROPs	8	64+700%
TMUs	24	160+567%
L2 Cache	1 MB	8 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G210M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X800 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce G210M	RADEON X800 SE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce G210M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X800 SE carries 256 MB. GeForce G210M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G210M and 64-bit on the RADEON X800 SE. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G210M) vs 8 MB (RADEON X800 SE) — the RADEON X800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce G210M	RADEON X800 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	8 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce G210M) vs 9_0b (RADEON X800 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce G210M	RADEON X800 SE
DirectX	10.1+12%	9_0b
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G210M draws 16W versus the RADEON X800 SE's 55W — a 109.9% difference. The GeForce G210M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G210M) vs 350W (RADEON X800 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce G210M	RADEON X800 SE
TDP	16W-71%	55W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	0mm	170mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	8.1+238%	2.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON X800 SE (2025 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce G210M	RADEON X800 SE
MSRP	—	$200
Codename	GM108	Strix Halo
Release	March 25 2016	January 6 2025
Ranking	#864	#98

Search GeForce G210M on Amazon

Search RADEON X800 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.