GeForce G210M vs Radeon HD 7310

NVIDIA

GeForce G210M

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7310

2013Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce G210M vs Radeon HD 7310 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G210M vs Radeon HD 7310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G210M vs Radeon HD 7310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G210M

2016

Why buy it

  • 4.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 16W instead of 47W, a 31W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $20 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7310

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($20 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce G210M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 193.8% higher power demand at 47W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce G210M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (129 vs 128), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce G210M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7310 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce G210M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce G210M vs Radeon HD 7310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce G210M

The GeForce G210M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7310

The Radeon HD 7310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 128 points. Launch price was $59.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G210M scores 129 and the Radeon HD 7310 reaches 128 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G210M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 7310 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce G210M) vs 384 (Radeon HD 7310). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G210M) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7310).

FeatureGeForce G210MRadeon HD 7310
G3D Mark Score
129
128
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
384+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5084 TFLOPS
0.6144 TFLOPS+21%
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
128 KB+33%
96 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G210M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce G210MRadeon HD 7310
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G210M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7310. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G210M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7310) — the GeForce G210M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce G210MRadeon HD 7310
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G210M draws 16W versus the Radeon HD 7310's 47W — a 98.4% difference. The GeForce G210M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G210M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7310). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce G210MRadeon HD 7310
TDP
16W-66%
47W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
8.1+200%
2.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce G210M (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce G210MRadeon HD 7310
MSRP
$20
Codename
GM108
Cape Verde
Release
March 25 2016
May 1 2013
Ranking
#864
#841

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.