GeForce 9300 vs GeForce G210M

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce G210M

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz

GeForce 9300 vs GeForce G210M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9300 vs GeForce G210M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9300 vs GeForce G210M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9300

2015

Why buy it

  • 1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 106.3% higher power demand at 33W vs 16W.

GeForce G210M

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 16W instead of 33W, a 17W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 9300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 9300 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce G210M instead at 129 vs 127, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 9300 vs GeForce G210M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300

The GeForce 9300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce G210M

The GeForce G210M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9300 scores 127 and the GeForce G210M reaches 129 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce G210M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300) vs 256 (GeForce G210M). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G210M). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 993 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 9300GeForce G210M
G3D Mark Score
127
129+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384+50%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS+42%
0.5084 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
941 MHz
993 MHz+6%
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9300GeForce G210M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300 and 128-bit on the GeForce G210M.

FeatureGeForce 9300GeForce G210M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9300) vs 10.1 (GeForce G210M). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce 9300GeForce G210M
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+10%
10.1
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9300) vs No (GeForce G210M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9300) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce G210M).

FeatureGeForce 9300GeForce G210M
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP2)
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9300 draws 33W versus the GeForce G210M's 16W — a 69.4% difference. The GeForce G210M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300) vs 350W (GeForce G210M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce 9300GeForce G210M
TDP
33W
16W-52%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
3.8
8.1+113%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce G210M (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 9300GeForce G210M
MSRP
$60
Codename
GM108
GM108
Release
March 13 2015
March 25 2016
Ranking
#810
#864

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.