GeForce 9300 vs RADEON X800 SE

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON X800 SE

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9300 vs RADEON X800 SE Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9300 vs RADEON X800 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9300 vs RADEON X800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9300

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $140 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 225.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 33W instead of 55W, a 22W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 170mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RADEON X800 SE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON X800 SE

2025

Why buy it

  • 3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 233.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON X800 SE is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (130 vs 127), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON X800 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $140 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 225.6% (2.1 vs 0.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 9300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON X800 SE has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9300 vs RADEON X800 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300

The GeForce 9300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points.

AMD

RADEON X800 SE

The RADEON X800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 130 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9300 scores 127 and the RADEON X800 SE reaches 130 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300 is built on Maxwell while the RADEON X800 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300) vs 2,560 (RADEON X800 SE). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 SE). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 9300RADEON X800 SE
G3D Mark Score
127
130+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
384
2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS
14.85 TFLOPS+1955%
Boost Clock
941 MHz
2900 MHz+208%
ROPs
8
64+700%
TMUs
24
160+567%
L2 Cache
1 MB
8 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9300 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X800 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9300RADEON X800 SE
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9300 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X800 SE carries 256 MB. GeForce 9300 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300 and 64-bit on the RADEON X800 SE. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300) vs 8 MB (RADEON X800 SE) — the RADEON X800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9300RADEON X800 SE
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
8 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9300) vs 9_0b (RADEON X800 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9300RADEON X800 SE
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+23%
9_0b
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9300 draws 33W versus the RADEON X800 SE's 55W — a 50% difference. The GeForce 9300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300) vs 350W (RADEON X800 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce 9300RADEON X800 SE
TDP
33W-40%
55W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
170mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
3.8+58%
2.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9300 came in at $60, while the RADEON X800 SE launched at $200. On MSRP, GeForce 9300 was 70% cheaper ($140 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (GeForce 9300) vs 0.7 (RADEON X800 SE) — the GeForce 9300 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X800 SE (2025 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 9300RADEON X800 SE
MSRP
$60-70%
$200
Performance per Dollar
2.1+200%
0.7
Codename
GM108
Strix Halo
Release
March 13 2015
January 6 2025
Ranking
#810
#98

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.