
GeForce 9300 vs Quadro FX 1400

GeForce 9300
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 1400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9300 is positioned at rank 633 and the Quadro FX 1400 is on rank 410, so the Quadro FX 1400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 9300 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GeForce 9300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 1400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1400.
| Insight | GeForce 9300 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 53.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9300 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+53.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9300 and Quadro FX 1400

GeForce 9300
The GeForce 9300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points.

Quadro FX 1400
The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9300 scores 127 and the Quadro FX 1400 reaches 124 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300 is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300) vs 192 (Quadro FX 1400). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400).
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 127+2% | 124 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS+56% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 24+200% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+426% | 0.19 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9300 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1400 has 128 MB. The GeForce 9300 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 1400) — the GeForce 9300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+426% | 0.19 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9300 draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 1400's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 9300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-78% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.8+375% | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9300 launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Quadro FX 1400 launched at $799 and now averages $30. The GeForce 9300 costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.3 (GeForce 9300) vs 4.1 (Quadro FX 1400) — the GeForce 9300 offers 53.7% better value. The GeForce 9300 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | Quadro FX 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-92% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-33% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3+54% | 4.1 |
| Codename | GM108 | GT200B |
| Release | March 13 2015 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #810 | #884 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











