GeForce G210M
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 4330

GeForce G210M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4330

NVIDIA

GeForce G210M

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4330

2009Core: 550 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce G210M is positioned at rank 436 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is on rank 599, so the GeForce G210M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce G210M

#426
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1683%
#428
1526%
#429
1522%
#433
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1384%
#434
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1374%
#436
GeForce G210M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#437
Radeon HD 8450G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#438
Radeon R3
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#439
97%
#441
Radeon HD 8550G + 8600M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#443
Radeon R9 M360
MSRP: $300|Avg: $81
94%
#444
Radeon HD 8550G + 7600M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
93%
#445
Radeon R9 M365X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
92%
#446
GeForce 7800 GS
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
91%
#447
Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
91%
#448
Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP: $200|Avg: $30
91%
#449
Mobility Radeon HD 5165
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
90%
#450
Radeon R5 M435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
89%
#451
Radeon E8860
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4330

#587
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3934%
#589
3566%
#590
3557%
#594
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3234%
#595
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3212%
#597
GeForce 210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
100%
#598
Mobility Radeon X1900
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#599
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
100%
#600
Radeon R7 M365X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#601
Mobility Radeon HD 5870
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
99%
#602
Radeon R7 M260DX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#603
Radeon HD 8610G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#604
95%
#605
Radeon HD 4650 AGP
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
94%
#606
GeForce 9800M GS
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
94%
#607
Radeon R7 M270
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
93%
#608
GeForce 9800 GTX
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
93%
#609
Mobility Radeon HD 5850
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
92%
#610
92%
#612
GeForce 205
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce G210M is significantly newer (2016 vs 2009). The GeForce G210M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce G210M.

InsightGeForce G210MMobility Radeon HD 4330
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%)
Leading raw performance (+4.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce G210M and Mobility Radeon HD 4330

NVIDIA

GeForce G210M

The GeForce G210M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4330

The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G210M scores 129 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 reaches 135 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G210M is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce G210M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G210M) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4330).

FeatureGeForce G210MMobility Radeon HD 4330
G3D Mark Score
129
135+5%
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
256
800+213%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5084 TFLOPS
0.88 TFLOPS+73%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
128 KB
160 KB+25%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce G210MMobility Radeon HD 4330
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G210M) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) — the GeForce G210M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce G210MMobility Radeon HD 4330
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce G210M) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce G210MMobility Radeon HD 4330
DirectX
10.1
10.1
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce G210M) vs UVD2 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce G210M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330).

FeatureGeForce G210MMobility Radeon HD 4330
Encoder
No
UVD2
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G210M draws 16W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4330's 30W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce G210M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G210M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4330). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce G210MMobility Radeon HD 4330
TDP
16W-47%
30W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80°C
Perf/Watt
8.1+80%
4.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce G210M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce G210MMobility Radeon HD 4330
MSRP
$49
Avg Price (30d)
$49
Codename
GM108
M98
Release
March 25 2016
January 9 2009
Ranking
#864
#927