GeForce G210M vs Mobility Radeon X1900

NVIDIA

GeForce G210M

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon X1900

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce G210M vs Mobility Radeon X1900 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G210M vs Mobility Radeon X1900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G210M

2016

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 16W instead of 50W, a 34W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Mobility Radeon X1900

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 212.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon X1900 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.7% in PassMark G3D (135 vs 129), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce G210M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon X1900 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon X1900 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce G210M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce G210M vs Mobility Radeon X1900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce G210M

The GeForce G210M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon X1900

The Mobility Radeon X1900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G210M scores 129 and the Mobility Radeon X1900 reaches 135 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G210M is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon X1900 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce G210M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1900). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G210M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1900).

FeatureGeForce G210MMobility Radeon X1900
G3D Mark Score
129
135+5%
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
256
800+213%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5084 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+120%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
128 KB+60%
80 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G210M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon X1900 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce G210MMobility Radeon X1900
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce G210M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X1900 carries 256 MB. GeForce G210M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G210M and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1900. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G210M) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X1900) — the GeForce G210M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce G210MMobility Radeon X1900
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce G210M) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1900). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce G210MMobility Radeon X1900
DirectX
10.1+12%
9.0c
OpenGL
3.3+65%
2.0
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G210M draws 16W versus the Mobility Radeon X1900's 50W — a 103% difference. The GeForce G210M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G210M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1900). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 90°C.

FeatureGeForce G210MMobility Radeon X1900
TDP
16W-68%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C-22%
90°C
Perf/Watt
8.1+200%
2.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce G210M (2016 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce G210MMobility Radeon X1900
MSRP
$49
Codename
GM108
Broadway
Release
March 25 2016
January 7 2010
Ranking
#864
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.