Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 4250
Quadro FX 1400
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1400 is positioned at rank 410 and the Radeon HD 4250 is on rank 299, so the Radeon HD 4250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1400
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4250
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 1400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 4250 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4250 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4250 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $30), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 197.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+197.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1400 and Radeon HD 4250
Quadro FX 1400
The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Radeon HD 4250
The Radeon HD 4250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 123 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 1400 scores 124 and the Radeon HD 4250 reaches 123 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 4250 uses TeraScale, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4250). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4250).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 124 | 123 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 800+317% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 1 TFLOPS+116% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 1400 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4250 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 4250 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 1400) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 4250) — the Radeon HD 4250 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1400 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 4250's 110W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon HD 4250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 110W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8 | 1.1+38% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 1400 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 4250 launched at $50 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 4250 costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.1 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 12.3 (Radeon HD 4250) — the Radeon HD 4250 offers 200% better value.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1400 | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $50-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $10-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.1 | 12.3+200% |
| Codename | GT200B | RV770 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | June 25 2008 |
| Ranking | #884 | #876 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 1400 and Radeon HD 4250
