Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 4250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 4250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 4250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1400

2008

Why buy it

✅0.7% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1498% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.

Radeon HD 4250

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $749 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1485.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 1400 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 1400 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.7% in average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (124 vs 123), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 1400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4250 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $749 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1485.1% (2.5 vs 0.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4250 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 1400 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 1400 vs Radeon HD 4250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1400

The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon HD 4250

The Radeon HD 4250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 123 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1400 scores 124 and the Radeon HD 4250 reaches 123 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 4250 uses TeraScale, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4250). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4250).

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 4250
G3D Mark Score	124	123
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale
Process Node	55 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	192	800+317%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	1 TFLOPS+116%
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L2 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 4250
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1400 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4250 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 4250 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1400 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4250. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 1400) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 4250) — the Radeon HD 4250 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 4250
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1400 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 4250's 110W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon HD 4250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 4250
TDP	150W	110W-27%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	0.8	1.1+38%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 1400 came in at $799, while the Radeon HD 4250 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4250 was 93.7% cheaper ($749 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (Quadro FX 1400) vs 2.5 (Radeon HD 4250) — the Radeon HD 4250 offers 1150% better value.

Feature	Quadro FX 1400	Radeon HD 4250
MSRP	$799	$50-94%
Performance per Dollar	0.2	2.5+1150%
Codename	GT200B	RV770
Release	November 11 2008	June 25 2008
Ranking	#884	#876

Search Quadro FX 1400 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4250 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.