GeForce G210M vs Quadro FX 1400

NVIDIA

GeForce G210M

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1400

2008Core: 602 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce G210M vs Quadro FX 1400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G210M vs Quadro FX 1400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G210M vs Quadro FX 1400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G210M

2016

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • Draws 16W instead of 150W, a 134W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quadro FX 1400

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 837.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce G210M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4% in PassMark G3D (129 vs 124), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce G210M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 1400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 1400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce G210M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce G210M vs Quadro FX 1400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce G210M

The GeForce G210M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1400

The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G210M scores 129 and the Quadro FX 1400 reaches 124 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G210M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce G210M) vs 192 (Quadro FX 1400). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G210M) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400).

FeatureGeForce G210MQuadro FX 1400
G3D Mark Score
129+4%
124
Architecture
Maxwell
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
256+33%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5084 TFLOPS+10%
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
24+200%
TMUs
24
64+167%
L2 Cache
1 MB+426%
0.19 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G210M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce G210MQuadro FX 1400
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce G210M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1400 carries 128 MB. GeForce G210M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G210M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1400. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G210M) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 1400) — the GeForce G210M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce G210MQuadro FX 1400
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+300%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+426%
0.19 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G210M draws 16W versus the Quadro FX 1400's 150W — a 161.4% difference. The GeForce G210M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G210M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce G210MQuadro FX 1400
TDP
16W-89%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
8.1+913%
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce G210M (2016 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce G210MQuadro FX 1400
MSRP
$799
Codename
GM108
GT200B
Release
March 25 2016
November 11 2008
Ranking
#864
#884

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.