GeForce 405 vs Radeon HD 6310

NVIDIA

GeForce 405

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6310

2011Core: 750 MHz

GeForce 405 vs Radeon HD 6310 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 405 vs Radeon HD 6310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 405 vs Radeon HD 6310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 405

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $10 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 20.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 75W instead of 186W, a 111W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6310

2011

Why buy it

  • βœ…2.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    25% HIGHER MSRP
    $50 MSRPvs$40 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
  • ❌148% higher power demand at 186W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.4% in PassMark G3D (122 vs 118), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 405 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 405 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $40 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 20.9% (3.0 vs 2.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 6310 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 405 vs Radeon HD 6310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 405

The GeForce 405 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6310

The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 405 scores 118 and the Radeon HD 6310 reaches 122 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 405 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6310 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 405) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 405) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6310).

FeatureGeForce 405Radeon HD 6310
G3D Mark Score
118
122+3%
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640
1280+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS
1.92 TFLOPS+47%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
80+100%
L1 Cache
320 KB
320 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 405 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 405Radeon HD 6310
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 405 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6310. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 405) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6310) β€” the GeForce 405 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 405Radeon HD 6310
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 405 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 6310's 186W β€” a 85.1% difference. The GeForce 405 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 405) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6310). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 405Radeon HD 6310
TDP
75W-60%
186W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
β€”
Height
64mm
β€”
Slots
1
β€”
Temp (Load)
75Β°C
β€”
Perf/Watt
1.6+129%
0.7
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 405 came in at $40, while the Radeon HD 6310 launched at $50. On MSRP, GeForce 405 was 20% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.0 (GeForce 405) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) β€” the GeForce 405 offers 25% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 405 (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 405Radeon HD 6310
MSRP
$40-20%
$50
Performance per Dollar
3.0+25%
2.4
Codename
GM107
Cayman
Release
October 27 2015
December 1 2011
Ranking
#671
#598

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.