
GeForce 405

Radeon HD 6310
GeForce 405 vs Radeon HD 6310 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 405 vs Radeon HD 6310 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 405 vs Radeon HD 6310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 405
2015Why buy it
- β Costs $10 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- β Delivers 20.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- β Draws 75W instead of 186W, a 111W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Radeon HD 6310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 6310
2011Why buy it
- β 2.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- β2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β25% HIGHER MSRP$50 MSRPvs$40 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
- β148% higher power demand at 186W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 405 vs Radeon HD 6310 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 405
The GeForce 405 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

Radeon HD 6310
The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 405 scores 118 and the Radeon HD 6310 reaches 122 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 405 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6310 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 405) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 405) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6310).
| Feature | GeForce 405 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 118 | 122+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1280+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+47% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 405 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 405 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6310. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 405) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6310) β the GeForce 405 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 405 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 6310's 186W β a 85.1% difference. The GeForce 405 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 405) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6310). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-60% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | β |
| Height | 64mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 75Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6+129% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 405 came in at $40, while the Radeon HD 6310 launched at $50. On MSRP, GeForce 405 was 20% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.0 (GeForce 405) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) β the GeForce 405 offers 25% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 405 (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 405 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $40-20% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.0+25% | 2.4 |
| Codename | GM107 | Cayman |
| Release | October 27 2015 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #671 | #598 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














