
GeForce 405

GeForce Go 7800
GeForce 405 vs GeForce Go 7800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 405 vs GeForce Go 7800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 405 vs GeForce Go 7800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 405
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 7800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce Go 7800
2013Why buy it
- ✅2.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 405 vs GeForce Go 7800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 405
The GeForce 405 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

GeForce Go 7800
The GeForce Go 7800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 405 scores 118 and the GeForce Go 7800 reaches 115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 405 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce Go 7800 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 405) vs 2,304 (GeForce Go 7800). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 405) vs 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7800). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 118+3% | 115 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2304+260% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS | 4.156 TFLOPS+218% |
| Boost Clock | 1020 MHz+13% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 192+380% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+67% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 405 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 405 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7800 carries 256 MB. GeForce 405 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 405 and 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7800. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 405) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce Go 7800) — the GeForce 405 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 405) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7800). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 405) vs None (GeForce Go 7800). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 405) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce Go 7800).
| Feature | GeForce 405 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 405 draws 75W versus the GeForce Go 7800's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce 405 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 405) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7800). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 64mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6+220% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 405 (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 405 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $40 | — |
| Codename | GM107 | GK110 |
| Release | October 27 2015 | May 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #671 | #320 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














