GeForce 405 vs GeForce 8700M GT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 405 vs GeForce 8700M GT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 405 vs GeForce 8700M GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 405

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 8700M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce 8700M GT

2008

Why buy it

✅2.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 8700M GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 5.1% in PassMark G3D (124 vs 118), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 405 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 65nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 405 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce 8700M GT still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 405 vs GeForce 8700M GT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 405

The GeForce 405 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

GeForce 8700M GT

The GeForce 8700M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 405 scores 118 versus the GeForce 8700M GT's 124 — the GeForce 8700M GT leads by 5.1%. The GeForce 405 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 8700M GT uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 405) vs 224 (GeForce 8700M GT).

Feature	GeForce 405	GeForce 8700M GT
G3D Mark Score	118	124+5%
Architecture	Maxwell	G9x
Process Node	28 nm	65 nm
Shading Units	640+186%	224

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 405	GeForce 8700M GT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 405 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8700M GT carries 256 MB. GeForce 405 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 405 and 64-bit on the GeForce 8700M GT.

Feature	GeForce 405	GeForce 8700M GT
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 405) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8700M GT). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 405	GeForce 8700M GT
DirectX	10.1	10.0
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 405) vs No (GeForce 8700M GT). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 405) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8700M GT).

Feature	GeForce 405	GeForce 8700M GT
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2	MPEG-2,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 405 draws 75W versus the GeForce 8700M GT's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce 405 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 405) vs 350W (GeForce 8700M GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce 405	GeForce 8700M GT
TDP	75W-50%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	64mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	1.6+100%	0.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 405 came in at $40, while the GeForce 8700M GT launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce 8700M GT was 100+% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.0 (GeForce 405) vs Infinity (GeForce 8700M GT) — the GeForce 8700M GT offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 405 (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 405	GeForce 8700M GT
MSRP	$40	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	3.0	Infinity
Codename	GM107	NB9E-GTX
Release	October 27 2015	July 15 2008
Ranking	#671	#825

Search GeForce 405 on Amazon

Search GeForce 8700M GT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.