
GeForce 405

GeForce 7300 GT
GeForce 405 vs GeForce 7300 GT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 405 vs GeForce 7300 GT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 405 vs GeForce 7300 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 405
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 111.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 450W, a 375W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 170mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 7300 GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce 7300 GT
2022Why buy it
- ✅2.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅GeForce 405 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 7300 GT is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌122.5% HIGHER MSRP$89 MSRPvs$40 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
- ❌500% higher power demand at 450W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 405 vs GeForce 7300 GT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 405
The GeForce 405 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

GeForce 7300 GT
The GeForce 7300 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 405 scores 118 versus the GeForce 7300 GT's 124 — the GeForce 7300 GT leads by 5.1%. The GeForce 405 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 7300 GT uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 405) vs 10,752 (GeForce 7300 GT). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 405) vs 40 TFLOPS (GeForce 7300 GT). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 1860 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | GeForce 7300 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 118 | 124+5% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 10752+1580% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS | 40 TFLOPS+2963% |
| Boost Clock | 1020 MHz | 1860 MHz+82% |
| ROPs | 16 | 112+600% |
| TMUs | 40 | 336+740% |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 10.5 MB+3287% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 405 | GeForce 7300 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 405 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 7300 GT carries 256 MB. GeForce 405 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 405 and 128-bit on the GeForce 7300 GT. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 405) vs 6 MB (GeForce 7300 GT) — the GeForce 7300 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | GeForce 7300 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 405) vs 9.0c (GeForce 7300 GT). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | GeForce 7300 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 405) vs None (GeForce 7300 GT). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 405) vs MPEG-2,WMV,H.264 (GeForce 7300 GT).
| Feature | GeForce 405 | GeForce 7300 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | MPEG-2,WMV,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 405 draws 75W versus the GeForce 7300 GT's 450W — a 142.9% difference. The GeForce 405 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 405) vs 350W (GeForce 7300 GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | GeForce 7300 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-83% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 170mm |
| Height | 64mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6+433% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 405 came in at $40, while the GeForce 7300 GT launched at $89. On MSRP, GeForce 405 was 55.1% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.0 (GeForce 405) vs 1.4 (GeForce 7300 GT) — the GeForce 405 offers 114.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 7300 GT (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 405 | GeForce 7300 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $40-55% | $89 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.0+114% | 1.4 |
| Codename | GM107 | GA102 |
| Release | October 27 2015 | January 27 2022 |
| Ranking | #671 | #19 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














