
GeForce 405

Radeon HD 3470
GeForce 405 vs Radeon HD 3470 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 405 vs Radeon HD 3470 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 405 vs Radeon HD 3470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 405
2015Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 3470
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 405 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50% HIGHER MSRP$60 MSRPvs$40 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 405 vs Radeon HD 3470 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 405
The GeForce 405 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

Radeon HD 3470
The Radeon HD 3470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 117 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 405 scores 118 and the Radeon HD 3470 reaches 117 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 405 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 3470 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 405) vs 800 (Radeon HD 3470). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 405) vs 1.2 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3470).
| Feature | GeForce 405 | Radeon HD 3470 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 118 | 117 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 800+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS+9% | 1.2 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 405 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3470 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | Radeon HD 3470 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 405 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 3470. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 405) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 3470) — the GeForce 405 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | Radeon HD 3470 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 405) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 3470). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | Radeon HD 3470 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 405) vs UVD (Radeon HD 3470). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | Radeon HD 3470 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 405 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 3470's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce 405 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 405) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3470). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 405 | Radeon HD 3470 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-50% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 64mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6+100% | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 405 came in at $40, while the Radeon HD 3470 launched at $60. On MSRP, GeForce 405 was 33.3% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.0 (GeForce 405) vs 1.9 (Radeon HD 3470) — the GeForce 405 offers 57.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 405 (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 405 | Radeon HD 3470 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $40-33% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.0+58% | 1.9 |
| Codename | GM107 | RV770 |
| Release | October 27 2015 | June 25 2008 |
| Ranking | #671 | #784 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














