GeForce 405 vs Quadro FX 1400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 405 vs Quadro FX 1400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 405 vs Quadro FX 1400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 405

2015

Why buy it

✅2.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $759 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1800.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 1400

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 405 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1897.5% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$40 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 405 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 1400 instead at 124 vs 118, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 405 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 405 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $759 cheaper on MSRP at $40 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1800.8% (3.0 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 405 vs Quadro FX 1400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 405

The GeForce 405 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

Quadro FX 1400

The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 405 scores 118 versus the Quadro FX 1400's 124 — the Quadro FX 1400 leads by 5.1%. The GeForce 405 is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 405) vs 192 (Quadro FX 1400). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 405) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400).

Feature	GeForce 405	Quadro FX 1400
G3D Mark Score	118	124+5%
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	640+233%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.306 TFLOPS+183%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	24+50%
TMUs	40	64+60%
L2 Cache	2 MB+953%	0.19 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 405 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 405	Quadro FX 1400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 405 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1400 carries 128 MB. GeForce 405 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 405 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 405) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 1400) — the GeForce 405 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 405	Quadro FX 1400
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+953%	0.19 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 405 draws 75W versus the Quadro FX 1400's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce 405 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 405) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 405	Quadro FX 1400
TDP	75W-50%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	64mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	1.6+100%	0.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 405 came in at $40, while the Quadro FX 1400 launched at $799. On MSRP, GeForce 405 was 95% cheaper ($759 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.0 (GeForce 405) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 1400) — the GeForce 405 offers 1400% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 405 (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 405	Quadro FX 1400
MSRP	$40-95%	$799
Performance per Dollar	3.0+1400%	0.2
Codename	GM107	GT200B
Release	October 27 2015	November 11 2008
Ranking	#671	#884

Search GeForce 405 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 1400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.