Radeon HD 6310 vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6310 vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6310 vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6310

2011

Why buy it

✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2% HIGHER MSRP
$50 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌520% higher power demand at 186W vs 30W.

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 186W, a 156W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (125 vs 122), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 6310 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2011 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4.6% (2.6 vs 2.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 6310 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6310 vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6310

The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400

The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 125 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6310 scores 122 and the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 reaches 125 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6310 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310) vs 800 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6310) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400).

Feature	Radeon HD 6310	Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
G3D Mark Score	122	125+2%
Architecture	TeraScale 3	TeraScale
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	1280+60%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.92 TFLOPS+118%	0.88 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L1 Cache	320 KB+100%	160 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 6310	Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6310 and 64-bit on the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6310) vs 256 KB (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) — the Radeon HD 6310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 6310	Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6310 draws 186W versus the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400's 30W — a 144.4% difference. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6310) vs 350W (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon HD 6310	Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
TDP	186W	30W-84%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	0.7	4.2+500%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6310 came in at $50, while the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 launched at $49. On MSRP, Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) vs 2.6 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) — the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 offers 8.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 6310 (2011 vs 2009).

Feature	Radeon HD 6310	Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
MSRP	$50	$49-2%
Performance per Dollar	2.4	2.6+8%
Codename	Cayman	M98
Release	December 1 2011	January 9 2009
Ranking	#598	#927

Search Radeon HD 6310 on Amazon

Search Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.