GeForce 8700M GT vs Radeon HD 6310

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8700M GT vs Radeon HD 6310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8700M GT vs Radeon HD 6310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8700M GT

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 150W instead of 186W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6310

2011

Why buy it

✅0.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌24% higher power demand at 186W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 8700M GT instead at 124 vs 122, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8700M GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6310 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 8700M GT has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 8700M GT vs Radeon HD 6310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8700M GT

The GeForce 8700M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points.

Radeon HD 6310

The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8700M GT scores 124 and the Radeon HD 6310 reaches 122 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8700M GT is built on G9x while the Radeon HD 6310 uses TeraScale 3, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8700M GT) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310).

Feature	GeForce 8700M GT	Radeon HD 6310
G3D Mark Score	124+2%	122
Architecture	G9x	TeraScale 3
Process Node	65 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	224	1280+471%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8700M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 8700M GT	Radeon HD 6310
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8700M GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6310 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6310 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8700M GT and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6310.

Feature	GeForce 8700M GT	Radeon HD 6310
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8700M GT draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6310's 186W — a 21.4% difference. The GeForce 8700M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8700M GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6310). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 8700M GT	Radeon HD 6310
TDP	150W-19%	186W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.8+14%	0.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8700M GT came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 6310 launched at $50. On MSRP, GeForce 8700M GT was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 8700M GT) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) — the GeForce 8700M GT offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 6310 (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 8700M GT	Radeon HD 6310
MSRP	$0-100%	$50
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	2.4
Codename	NB9E-GTX	Cayman
Release	July 15 2008	December 1 2011
Ranking	#825	#598

Search GeForce 8700M GT on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.