GeForce 310M vs GeForce 8700M GT

NVIDIA

GeForce 310M

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 8700M GT

2008Core: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 310M vs GeForce 8700M GT Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 310M vs GeForce 8700M GT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 310M vs GeForce 8700M GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 310M

2015

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 8700M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce 8700M GT

2008

Why buy it

  • 2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 8700M GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 310M instead at 127 vs 124, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 310M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 65nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 310M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce 8700M GT still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 310M vs GeForce 8700M GT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 310M

The GeForce 310M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8700M GT

The GeForce 8700M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 310M scores 127 and the GeForce 8700M GT reaches 124 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 310M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 8700M GT uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 310M) vs 224 (GeForce 8700M GT).

FeatureGeForce 310MGeForce 8700M GT
G3D Mark Score
127+2%
124
Architecture
Maxwell
G9x
Process Node
28 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
384+71%
224

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 310MGeForce 8700M GT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 310M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8700M GT carries 256 MB. GeForce 310M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 310M and 64-bit on the GeForce 8700M GT.

FeatureGeForce 310MGeForce 8700M GT
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 310M) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8700M GT). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 310MGeForce 8700M GT
DirectX
10.1
10.0
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 310M) vs No (GeForce 8700M GT). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 310M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8700M GT).

FeatureGeForce 310MGeForce 8700M GT
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 310M draws 33W versus the GeForce 8700M GT's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 310M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 310M) vs 350W (GeForce 8700M GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce 310MGeForce 8700M GT
TDP
33W-78%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
3.8+375%
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 310M (2015 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 310MGeForce 8700M GT
MSRP
$0
Codename
GM108
NB9E-GTX
Release
March 13 2015
July 15 2008
Ranking
#880
#825

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.