
GeForce 8700M GT

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
GeForce 8700M GT vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8700M GT vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce 8700M GT vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8700M GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.
Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
2009Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8700M GT vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8700M GT
The GeForce 8700M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points.

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 125 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8700M GT scores 124 and the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 reaches 125 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8700M GT is built on G9x while the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 uses TeraScale, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8700M GT) vs 800 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400).
| Feature | GeForce 8700M GT | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 124 | 125 |
| Architecture | G9x | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 800+257% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8700M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8700M GT | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8700M GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 carries 512 MB. Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8700M GT and 64-bit on the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400.
| Feature | GeForce 8700M GT | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8700M GT) vs 10_1 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 8700M GT | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10_1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8700M GT) vs UVD (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD.
| Feature | GeForce 8700M GT | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8700M GT draws 150W versus the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8700M GT) vs 350W (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 8700M GT | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 30W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8 | 4.2+425% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8700M GT came in at $0, while the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 launched at $49. On MSRP, GeForce 8700M GT was 100+% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 8700M GT) vs 2.6 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) — the GeForce 8700M GT offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 (2009 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 8700M GT | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 2.6 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | M98 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #825 | #927 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














