Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon HD 6310

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon HD 6310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon HD 6310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 2400 XT

2012

Why buy it

✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
58% HIGHER MSRP
$79 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6310

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6310 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (122 vs 119), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 2400 XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $79, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 62% (2.4 vs 1.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 2400 XT has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon HD 6310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 2400 XT

The Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 119 points. Launch price was $270.

Radeon HD 6310

The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 2400 XT scores 119 and the Radeon HD 6310 reaches 122 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 2400 XT is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6310 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310). Raw compute: 2.995 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6310).

Feature	Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon HD 6310
G3D Mark Score	119	122+3%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1536+20%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.995 TFLOPS+56%	1.92 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	96+20%	80
L1 Cache	384 KB+20%	320 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon HD 6310
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 2400 XT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6310 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6310 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2400 XT and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6310.

Feature	Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon HD 6310
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2400 XT draws 185W versus the Radeon HD 6310's 186W — a 0.5% difference. The Radeon HD 2400 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6310). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon HD 6310
TDP	185W	186W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	0.6	0.7+17%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 2400 XT came in at $79, while the Radeon HD 6310 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6310 was 36.7% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) — the Radeon HD 6310 offers 60% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 2400 XT (2012 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon HD 2400 XT	Radeon HD 6310
MSRP	$79	$50-37%
Performance per Dollar	1.5	2.4+60%
Codename	Tahiti	Cayman
Release	November 19 2012	December 1 2011
Ranking	#469	#598

Search Radeon HD 2400 XT on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.